CZ Stackable Ring Set in Sterling Silver
CZ Stackable Ring Set in Sterling Silver
Couldn't load pickup availability
Description
- Metal: Sterling silver, rhodium plated, stamped 925, nickel free.
- Stone: Set with premium quality 2.58 carat total (2mm) round simulated ruby cubic zirconia in pave setting.
- Measurement: Bands measure 6mm in total width.
- Style No: VR635-02
This 3-piece eternity stacking ring set is dainty yet mighty. The simulated ruby adds a pop of color that elevates the look. Stack them for a statement-making look or wear them individually for understated elegance.
Tips!
This ring's band width is wide, so we suggest you choose a ring size 1/2 or 1 size larger than your standard ring size to make sure the ring will fit comfortably.
Product Details & Materials
Product Details & Materials
Jewelry Information
Style Number | VR635-02 |
---|---|
Metal | 925 sterling silver |
Plating | rhodium plated |
Finish | polished |
Nickel Free | Yes |
Ring Band Width | 6mm |
Jewelry Weight | 5.4 Grams |
cubic zirconia Information
Stone Cut | round cut | round cut |
---|---|---|
Stone Size | 2mm | 2mm |
Stone Color | clear Color | ruby Color |
Stone Setting | pave | pave |
Stone Quantity | 72 Stones | 14 Stones |
Stone Weight | 2.16 ct.tw | 0.42 ct.tw |
* All cubic zirconia stone weights are approximate and listed as diamond equivalent weight in carats.
Jewelry Care Tips
Jewelry Care Tips
Caring for your jewelry will ensure that it will last for years to come.
Take off jewelry when swimming or doing other physical activities.
Put on jewelry after applying lotion, hair spray, perfume or other chemicals.
For more jewelry care info, please visit our jewelry education page.
Have Questions?
Have Questions?
If you have any questions about our products or service, please contact us, call us 1-888-925-7569, online chat is also available.
Our friendly customer service agents will be glad to help. Our business hours are Monday to Saturday (9am - 5pm ET). Sunday (Closed).
You might want to check out our FAQ page to see if your question has already been answered.




